Voter Interest and the Two-Party System

I came across an interesting article on National Public Radio this week. It seemed to highlight what most people already know, but it got me to thinking about American politics and the way the country is run. The article, “As Political Disenchantment Soars, Lines at the Polls Grow Shorter,” focuses on why people are losing their interest in American politics, but does little to explore the sources of the issues.

American politics features the two-party system, one in which a third party will see little to no success. In recent years, this system has generated an immense amount of gridlock and even caused a few government shutdowns, the most recent being in October 2013. Without seeing much action from Washington, it’s no shock that voters aren’t showing up to the polls. If it seems like nothing is getting done, then coming out to vote, or even supporting a candidate in the first place, seems pointless.

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey via Compfight cc

So why does the two party system matter? In my opinion, based off of what I’ve learned in a few Comparative Politics classes, our system is set up perfectly to ensure gridlock. The system of checks and balances in our country has been tailored to make sure nobody has too much power, which is theoretically a great idea. At times like these, however, it can almost guarantee that no branch of government finds success, and that the American people are left feeling as though progress is nonexistent.

I also find issue with people being forced to, essentially, pick between two parties. If a new party is created, or someone supports a party that is not one of the primary two, political success seems to be unachievable even as far as representation is concerned. In other countries, like Great Britain, a two-party system does not necessarily mean the same thing. In their parliamentary system, there is still a majority party, but even the smaller parties will have opportunities for political success and representation.

When looking at all the variables, it’s not hard to believe that political interest is at an all-time low. America’s two-party system forces people to put their beliefs on one side of the line or the other if they want any chance of representation. Without seeing action from Washington, support will continue to diminish. It’s far too late to go back and alter the party system, so action from Congress will be needed to really generate interest on both sides of the party line in the coming elections.

Florida & The Same-Sex Marriage Ban

A big topic in politics lately has been same-sex marriage. Recently, homosexuals looking to marry have been granted the right to marry in Illinois. Nineteen states now allow for same-sex couples to get married, while this is progress for same-sex couples, it is obviously not a ruling that has taken the country by storm.

Florida has been a state where the same-sex marriage battle has been lost until recently. Judge Luis Garcia of Monroe County has overturned the same-sex marriage ban in his jurisdiction. As of next Tuesday (July 22, 2014) same-sex couples will be able to marry in Monroe County. This includes Key West.

Photo Credit: essygie via Compfight cc

The reason this is significant? Same-sex couples have been fighting for the right to marry for decades. In a state that has banned same-sex marriage, seeing an overturn is a sign of hope for those fighting for the cause. An article on National Public Radio quoted advocated Evan Wolfson saying “We can now add Florida’s voice to the urgent need for the Supreme Court to take a freedom to marry case and bring the entire country to national resolution, ending marriage discrimination across America.”

This bold move of overturning the majority vote will likely draw more attention, both positive and negative, to the fight for marriage equality. The significance of this case should not go unnoticed, and will likely generate a lot of talk along with some action. The coming months in Florida will be some to watch.

Feminism vs. Equality

If there’s one thing I’ve learned thus far in college, it’s that being a feminist is encouraged. Not only is it encouraged, but it is expected. Students today are expected to come into their own beliefs and views in college. We are learning about the errors of past generations, and using history to shape our own views especially along the lines of sexism and racism. So, it only seems fitting that college students, when asked if they are feminists, respond with a “yes.” After all, wouldn’t it be in poor taste to say anything else?

That answer is “no.”

After taking classes like Political Theory and Gender & Communication, I’ve learned that Feminism is a topic that finds its way into nearly every academic discipline. In these classes, I learned how far women have come, and how far women still have to go. Equality is the basis for nearly every feminist argument I’ve read. Women want to be treated as men’s equal. They want equal pay, to shatter glass-ceilings, and to be able to hold powerful positions without being looked at differently. Personally, I stand behind those views 100%. So, when I say I’m not a feminist, I do not want you to confuse it with being anti-woman.

If equality is the basis for the feminist movement, then I surely am not a feminist. In 2014, I find the feminist movement to be outdated and irrelevant. When I think of groups who are still struggling for equality, I look at the “new” issues that have come up. I don’t want to support feminism if it means leaving other groups behind. Sure, there are some groups of feminists that add other groups to the struggle, but shouldn’t they have their own cause? Are these groups so insignificant that they must be attached to the feminist movement?

Photo Credit: Melissa-Brewer via Compfight cc

I’m an advocate for equality. I do not believe that sex, gender, race, sexual orientation, or anything remotely related to that are grounds to consider another person as “less than.” I do not think that feminists are wrong, and I do not think that inequality between the sexes is nonexistent. I advocate equality across the board. Here is where I find the premise for my argument that feminism is irrelevant today. There are more inequalities in 2014 than just that between the sexes. Racism still exists. The idea of defining gender to only two is proving to create its own battle. Homosexuality and bisexuality are still discriminated against. Transgendered people are looked at as “freaks.” Women have come so far, it is time to give other forms of inequality their chance to come forward. These issues should not be tacked on to the coattails of the feminist movement, because frankly, they aren’t the same.

So, there it is. I’m not a feminist. Maybe on most college campuses that would be taboo to even contemplate saying, but I think it is what society needs to have being said. In order to get a movement towards equality to happen, all preconceived notions of feminism and the struggles related to it must be abandoned. If we want to see a future without discrimination, we need to see more minorities (not limited to race or ethnicity, but also in terms of sexuality, etc) being supported and advocated for. The feminist movement simply cannot handle all that has been put on its plate.